top of page



Representation at McGill: Why Students Should Look Within Rather than Above

 

By Asad Ali Walji

         McGill has an established global reputation as one of the best academic institutions Canada has to offer. However, it has also gained notoriety for its ineffective ability to help students troubleshoot their problems relating to university life. It is inevitable that every student attending McGill University will interact with the immensely intimidating bureaucratic network of faculty offices and student services that McGIll is so well known for having. The university’s perceived aloofness towards student issues, focus on expediency over effective problem solving and inattentive consideration for student wellbeing are as renowned hallmarks of McGill as the fossilized remains of the Gorgosaurus housed in Redpath Museum.
          Logically, the value of an institution is directly dependent upon that institution’s ability to reflect the interests of that community it attempts to serve. If an institution cannot fulfill its fundamental purpose through representation, the basis of its existence can be called into question. Furthermore, an institution’s value is directly dependent upon the flow of information between the administration that oversees its management and the people it attempts to represent. But what happens when these channels of communication break down?
       As of late, McGill University has become increasingly separated from being able to cater to the needs of students. This is partly because of inefficient financial management and partly because of a lack of established systems that facilitate the flow of information. Since budget cuts were announced last year, management at McGill has instituted a hiring freeze in administrative and clerical workers (not to mention the drastic closure of McIntyre Library). With 75 percent of McGill’s operating budget going towards salaries and pensions, it is inevitable that employees that act as liaisons between the university and students will bear the blunt of the cuts. McGill is a huge institution and sifting through the entire student body is a tremendous feat.
          To add insult to injury, new students coming to McGill are often given an incomprehensive introduction to the services and avenues of representation available at McGill. They are handed pamphlets listing obscure administrative offices dotting McGill’s campus, are briefly introduced to an extensive list of extra-curricular organizations that McGill hosts (without any explanation as to their function), and are provided a general formula for how students can go about addressing their various academic and non-academic issues. All too familiar is the disillusionment that students feel when they searching for the answer to a serious question pertaining to their enrolment at McGill. Service Point is usually the start of their long pilgrimage and when they find their answer, it usually presents itself in the form of friendly advice from a student who is their senior.
It goes without saying that McGill University is not responsible for all areas of student representation, but when fundamental services necessary to the ability of students to pursue academic goals the institution is falling short of its duty. The point is this: students at McGill cannot rely on the administration to guide them in their quest for answers nor provide them with daily updates about events on campus.     McGill teaches students how to problem-solve; not just in their academic study but also imparts personal coping mechanisms for dealing with ineffective systems meant to help individuals troubleshoot their problems, but often work against that goal. Students should come to the realization that this is a valuable life-lesson and look elsewhere for adequate representation.
          One of the most contentious issues that characterize economic and political development is the extent to the creation of representative agencies fragment or facilitate a healthy political environment. One thing is certain though, the lack of institutional representation is the perfect habitat where agencies of self-governance blossom; they serve to represent a disgruntled section of society. From Aboriginal communities to the societies based upon civil disobedience led by Mohandas Gandhi, communal agency serves to represent the interests of people disconnected from established avenues of representation. You might think what comes next is a stretch, but don’t student organizations at McGill serve the exact same purpose?  

          Granted, there are a variety of student organizations that each champion different sets of goals. From cultural to vocational organizations, these groups are meant to represent student interests. Despite all the problems with McGill’s representational structure, it does a good job at providing students with a systematic framework through which they can represent themselves (with regards to non-administrational issues).  This decentralized approach has advantages and drawbacks. Without a doubt, students benefit from the option of forming organizations that adequately represent their interests and can structure these organizations however they wish.
          On the other hand, the influence and effectiveness of these organizations (like academic and administrative institutions at McGill) depend upon the flow of information between the organizers and students. Those clubs that are most successful are both reflective of a largely common interest between students and have great exposure. This in turn allows them to represent effectively and with credibility. There are a countless number of smaller organizations led by McGill students that are stuck in the initial phases of their development, searching for opportunities to gain membership instead of pursuing an agenda of representation.
          Therefore, the major impediment to adequate student representation is a fundamental disconnect between students and representational bodies. In order for students at McGill to have adequate representation, there needs to be a new focus on student-led initiatives that elucidate the information gap between students and organizations their cohorts create. One such organization that serves this purpose is McGillography. Recognizing the unmistakable relevance of social networking sites like Facebook to McGill’s student body, McGillography briefly interviews students on campus who are members of student-led organizations or who are participating in events on campus. Each McGillograhy “Chapter” translates the spirit of the organization the group is covering, pictorially and through the interview question. Not only does is McGillography a kind of advertisement for the organizations it covers, but also presents a welcoming atmosphere for new students who are looking for an environment of likeminded individuals with similar interests.
          Ultimately, what it comes down to is whether students are willing to take the initiative to form their own representational bodies, or endure McGill’s bureaucracy to get their questions answered. Student-led organizations at McGill encourage healthy discourse, career networking, and even create opportunities for informal advice to save students a trip to Service Point. Decentralizing McGill’s avenues for representation is an effective way at counteracting the gargantuan bureaucracy at McGill. All that the university needs is students who are willing to act on their dissatisfaction with the status quo and spread the word about how the grassroots is always the most effective way of catering to a community.

 

bottom of page